FIS Scheduling Follies

I see on FasterSkier the news that there is already some angst regarding the FIS World Cup race calendar for next season.

I have two things say on this topic that takes the form of two graphs…

FIS cross country races:

IBU biathlon races:

A couple of notes:

  • Size of the dot is proportional to the proportion of that type of race that season
  • These are men’s races only; I’m not being sexist, I’m just saving time cause the women’s graphs would be exactly the same but the distances would be different.
  • Keep in mind that the XC non-pursuit non-team races are all further split into classic and freestyle; biathlon does only freestyle.
  • In XC, the stage races include a sort of smorgasboard of races from all the other types of individual races: sprints, interval starts, pursuits, mass starts and other “weird” races like 9km uphill races.  So if you wanted, you could make the XC graph look even messier.
  • Stage races are complete units.  You can’t just pick one of the stages and do only that.  You  have to do them all.
  • I also have glossed over the various format changes that happened in XC sprint racing over the years.
  • I could be oversimplifying the biathlon race formats, but I don’t think so.  (Well, I know that I omitted the mixed relays, but that’s it I think.)

I’m sure I’ve miscounted something somewhere here, but I think my point is still clear.

If there’s an editorial comment I mean to make, it’s simply that if FIS thinks that cycling-ish stage racing is where we’re headed, they should man up and just switch over completely.  Enough tinkering.  It’s time for XC skiing to choose an identity and then be that.


Related posts:

  1. Career Retrospective: Rene Sommerfeldt
  2. Career Retrospective: Sabina Valbusa
  3. Career Retrospective: Sara Renner
  4. Introducing: Biathlete Rankings
  5. Victims & Nemeses: Kris Freeman

About Joran


3 Responses to “FIS Scheduling Follies”
  1. Nat says:

    Wow–that’s definitely an example where a graph can show something clearly and succinctly where it otherwise would take a s–t-ton of words. Very cool.
    One thing that could be interesting to look at could be the distance and difficulty of sprint courses–I know that they’ve been making courses a lot longer over the past few years, and that could be interesting to see in graphical form. And I think they’ve been getting harder, too–maybe you could find a way to look at elevation changes, as well?


Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. […] listened with interest to that section, since I had recently commented on this situation as […]

  2. […] labelled these by race length, but biathlon race formats have been quite stable over the years.  The 7.5km is a “sprint”, which just means it’s short and they […]

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!