Looking Back At The Finnish Men

The death this week of Mika Myllylä has got me thinking about the Finnish men of that era generally, which led to this graph:

I’ve graphed FIS points here to include results at all levels. I’d forgotten about Isometsä’s attempts at a comeback after his suspension, which as you can see didn’t go all that well. I don’t have many results for Immonen for much of the 90’s. I don’t know if that’s because he didn’t really get good until the mid-90’s, or if perhaps I’m just missing a bunch of the FIS races he happened to do. Either way, he must have been racing in Finland, since he was over 30 by the time of the 2001 WSCs.

With the benefit of hindsight, it’s tempting to look at the dramatic jumps in performance, particularly in Isometsä, Kirvesniemi and Repo between 1999-2001 and say it should have been obvious, but these things are tough to suss out from just performance trends. Still, that was some resurgence by Kirvesniemi, no?


Related posts:

  1. Canadian Men’s Olympic Performance
  2. Is It Panic Time For The Norwegian Men’s Distance Skiers?
  3. Most Unimproved Men: Distance
  4. Most Unimproved: Men’s Sprint
  5. World Champs Preview: Distance

About Joran


One Response to “Looking Back At The Finnish Men”
  1. Very interesting. I’m less conservative that you are about the causes of big, abrupt performance improvements, but in some of these cases we *know* that doping was involved (as well as continued high-quality training and racing, of course). I wonder if these patterns could be used as a template to identify others with similar, possibly-dubious upticks in performance? Or perhaps these pattersn can also be found in other confirmed dopers. Veerpalu’s pattern doesn’t conform, but what about, say, Dementiev? Perhaps Kuitunen or Tchepalova?

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!