Climb To The Castle – Women

Same story as last time, only the women this time. Kikkan Randall may have made a better benchmark, but Liz Stephen is no slouch in WC distance events either.

As before, all of this is highly approximate.

I’ve taken Stephen’s races from last season, removed some of the least comparable (prologue’s for example), and then calculated where in each of these WC races folks would have placed if they finished the same percent behind Stephen as they did in Climb to the Castle. Blank entries in the table indicate that that person’s percent back places them after the last WC skiers in that race.

If you’re wondering about the runs of identical places in the columns, the reason is that there are often some large time gaps at the very back of the field, so there are a wide range of percent backs that might fit between second to last and last, for instance.

 

Name 11-20 12-11 12-18 02-19 02-26 03-05 03-12
STEPHEN 25 48 18 55 24 16 28
SARGENT 57 58 34 68 38 34 47
GERAGHTY-MOATS 75 62 47 48 43 58
DREISSIGACKER 79 63 49 50 48 63
SPECTOR 84 63 52 49 67
EGAN 86 53 49
DUNKLEE 86 53 49
KILLIGREW 86 49
DROLET 86 51
ATTALI 86 51

Related posts:

  1. Are Women’s WC Fields Really ‘Weaker’?
  2. Beitostølen FIS Race Recap: Women
  3. Climb To The Castle – Men
  4. La Clusaz Recap: North American Women
  5. Race Snapshot: TdS Final Climb

About Joran

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!